mirror of
https://github.com/nesquena/hermes-webui.git
synced 2026-07-16 20:50:18 +00:00
066f727271
* fix(streaming): normalize inline thinking extraction across live and persisted turns (#3599) # Conflicts: # api/streaming.py # static/messages.js # static/ui.js * fix(streaming): code-aware inline-thinking extraction + position-aware unclosed handling Codex deep-review caught two regressions in the leading-only -> full-scan rewrite (both silent data-mangling on the persist/reload path): 1. Code-span unawareness: the scanner only protected triple fences, so a literal <think> in an inline single-backtick code span or an indented (>=4-space/tab) code block got silently extracted into reasoning. Added _inline_thinking_indented_code_at + inline-backtick tracking (Python + the JS twin _thinkingIndentedCodeAt), so all three code contexts now keep thinking tags visible. 2. Unclosed-tag truncation: any unmatched open tag moved the trailing prose into reasoning. Now position-aware — a LEADING unclosed block (cut off mid-thought) is still reasoning (#3455 intent), but an unclosed tag AFTER visible content stays visible so literal typed tags don't truncate prose. Gated partial handling on the previously-unused options.streaming param (live streaming keeps 'still thinking' behavior; persist/reload does not). Updated 2 tests that pinned the buggy behavior + added 4 regression tests (inline-backtick, indented-code, mid-body-unclosed-visible, leading-unclosed- extracted). Updated the node driver harness to include the new helper. Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(streaming): recognize fenced code blocks indented 1-3 spaces Codex round-3: a fence indented 1-3 spaces is valid Markdown but the fence detector only matched at column 0, so a literal think tag inside such a fence (not 4+-space indented code either) was still extracted. Both detectors (_inline_thinking_fence_marker_at / _thinkingFenceMarkerAt) now walk back over up to 3 leading spaces to a line start. Added backtick + tilde indented-fence regression tests. Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(streaming): O(n) inline-thinking scan + merge separate reasoning on reload Round-4 Codex deep-review caught two real issues in my own fixes: 1. PERF (O(n^2)): the indented-code check (_inline_thinking_indented_code_at / _thinkingIndentedCodeAt) scanned to line boundaries at EVERY character index, plus the leading check sliced+stripped the whole prefix per unclosed tag. On long no-newline content this was quadratic (~8.4s @ 200k, called repeatedly on the streaming path). Replaced with incremental O(1)-per-iteration line state (_line_is_indented_code / _lineIsIndentedCode evaluated only at line starts) + a seen_nonspace flag. 200k now extracts in ~55-140ms. 2. RELOAD reasoning-drop: renderMessages() seeded the shared extractor with '' so a message with BOTH an inline <think> block AND a separate m.reasoning payload showed only the inline part — the separate payload was dropped because the !thinkingText worklog resolution was then skipped. Now seeds with the message's direct reasoning (m.reasoning_content||m.reasoning||...) so the two MERGE (deduped); separate-only reasoning is preserved without promoting it into visible prose. Python + JS twins kept line-for-line parity. Added merge + perf + reload regression tests; updated the reload structure test and the node driver harness for the renamed helper. Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(streaming): revert reload reasoning-seed; keep O(n) perf fix Codex round-4 finding #2 (seed renderMessages' inline extractor with m.reasoning so a separate payload merges) turned out to VIOLATE a deliberate architectural invariant pinned by test_issue2565 + test_sprint42: the reload content-extraction path must NOT touch m.reasoning/m.reasoning_content — reasoning metadata is owned exclusively by the Worklog Thinking Card path (_worklogReasoningTextFromMessage / _assistantReasoningPayloadText), never conflated with inline-content extraction (which would risk promoting provider reasoning into final-answer prose). Reverted the ui.js seed to the PR's original `thinkingText` arg. The inline+separate merge is still a genuine extractor capability (exercised by the live streaming path via liveReasoningText) and is covered by a unit test, just not invoked from the reload render path by design. The O(n) perf fix (finding #1) and the code-awareness + position-aware unclosed handling (rounds 1-3) are all retained. Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(streaming): only lstrip extracted content when a leading block was removed Codex round-5 catch: the extractor unconditionally lstripped the final content (.lstrip() / .replace(/^\s+/,'')) even when NO thinking block was extracted, so an assistant reply that legitimately starts with an indented code block or blank lines lost its leading whitespace on live display, reload, and persistence. This was a real regression vs master (master returned non-thinking content unchanged). Now track leading_removed (set only when a LEADING thinking block/prefix is actually extracted) and lstrip only in that case. Mid-body / no-thinking content keeps its exact leading whitespace. Python + JS twins kept in parity; added backend regression tests (indented-first preserved, leading-blank preserved, leading-think still strips). Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(streaming): reconnect restore prefers raw inflight accumulator Codex round-6 CORE catch: on reconnect, the single-live-message restore used (_liveInflightAssistant.content || ''). Because the PR now splits a leading unclosed <think> into empty content, restoring from the split content dropped the open tag — so a later </think> token leaked into the visible reply and corrupted the live accumulator. Restore from (_fullInflightAssistant || _liveInflightAssistant.content || '') so the raw open tag survives reconnect and the accumulator stays correct. Added a reconnect-restore regression test. Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> * Release v0.51.335 — Release KY (normalize inline thinking extraction, #3633) Unify inline-thinking (<think>/<|channel>/<|turn|>) extraction across live, reload, and persisted turns (#3599/#3633, @rodboev). Deep-reviewed: Opus + 6 Codex rounds; maintainer fixes resolved every Codex finding — code-awareness (inline-backtick/indented/1-3-space fences keep literal tags visible), position-aware unclosed handling, O(n) line scanning (was O(n^2) on long content), conditional lstrip (preserve leading whitespace when no leading block removed), and a reconnect-restore CORE fix (raw accumulator preferred so an open <think> tag survives reconnect). Python + JS twins in parity. Full suite 8330, Opus SHIP-SAFE, Codex SAFE-TO-SHIP, ESLint/scope-undef/ruff clean. Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Rod Boev <rod.boev@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hermes Agent <hermes-agent@nesquena-hermes.local> Co-authored-by: rodboev <rodboev@users.noreply.github.com>
153 lines
6.1 KiB
Python
153 lines
6.1 KiB
Python
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
from api.streaming import _split_thinking_from_content
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPO = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
|
|
MESSAGES_JS = (REPO / "static" / "messages.js").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
UI_JS = (REPO / "static" / "ui.js").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
WORKSPACE_JS = (REPO / "static" / "workspace.js").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _function_body(src: str, signature: str) -> str:
|
|
start = src.index(signature)
|
|
brace = src.index("{", start)
|
|
depth = 0
|
|
for i in range(brace, len(src)):
|
|
if src[i] == "{":
|
|
depth += 1
|
|
elif src[i] == "}":
|
|
depth -= 1
|
|
if depth == 0:
|
|
return src[start : i + 1]
|
|
raise AssertionError(f"function body not found: {signature}")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_split_clean_leading_think_block():
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>plan</think>\nanswer")
|
|
|
|
assert content == "answer"
|
|
assert reasoning == "plan"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_split_extracts_non_leading_complete_block():
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("visible before <think>hidden</think> visible after")
|
|
|
|
assert "<think>" not in content
|
|
assert "visible before" in content
|
|
assert "visible after" in content
|
|
assert reasoning == "hidden"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_split_extracts_multiple_complete_blocks():
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>one</think><think>two</think> final")
|
|
|
|
assert content == "final"
|
|
assert reasoning == "one\n\ntwo"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_split_keeps_fenced_code_literal_think_visible():
|
|
raw = "```html\n<think>literal</think>\n```\nanswer"
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content(raw)
|
|
|
|
assert content == raw
|
|
assert reasoning == ""
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_split_merges_existing_reasoning_without_duplicate():
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>same</think>answer", "same")
|
|
|
|
assert content == "answer"
|
|
assert reasoning == "same"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_split_merges_existing_reasoning_with_new_inline_block():
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>inline</think>answer", "separate")
|
|
|
|
assert content == "answer"
|
|
assert reasoning == "separate\n\ninline"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_reasoning_only_content_survives_reload_source_fields():
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>only reasoning</think>")
|
|
|
|
assert content == ""
|
|
assert reasoning == "only reasoning"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_unclosed_inline_thinking_after_content_stays_visible_on_persist():
|
|
"""#3633 deep-review (Codex catch): on the PERSIST path an unclosed think tag
|
|
that appears AFTER visible content is almost always a literal typed tag, so
|
|
the prose after it must NOT be silently truncated into reasoning. A LEADING
|
|
unclosed block (cut off mid-thought) is still treated as reasoning."""
|
|
# Mid-body unclosed → stays fully visible, nothing moved to reasoning.
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("answer<think>still thinking")
|
|
assert content == "answer<think>still thinking"
|
|
assert reasoning == ""
|
|
|
|
# Leading unclosed → genuine cut-off thinking trace, moves to reasoning.
|
|
lead_content, lead_reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>still thinking")
|
|
assert lead_content == ""
|
|
assert lead_reasoning == "still thinking"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_messages_js_live_and_persist_paths_share_extractor():
|
|
stream_display = _function_body(MESSAGES_JS, "function _streamDisplay")
|
|
parse_state = _function_body(MESSAGES_JS, "function _parseStreamState")
|
|
split_persist = _function_body(MESSAGES_JS, "function _splitThinkFromContent")
|
|
|
|
assert "_extractInlineThinkingFromContent(_stripXmlToolCalls(assistantText), liveReasoningText, {streaming:true}).content" in stream_display
|
|
assert "return _extractInlineThinkingFromContent(_stripXmlToolCalls(assistantText), liveReasoningText, {streaming:true});" in parse_state
|
|
assert "return _extractInlineThinkingFromContent(rawContent, existingReasoning, {streaming:false});" in split_persist
|
|
assert "window._extractInlineThinkingFromContentForRender" in MESSAGES_JS
|
|
assert "_thinkingFenceMarkerAt" in MESSAGES_JS
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_render_messages_uses_shared_extractor_on_reload():
|
|
render = _function_body(UI_JS, "function renderMessages")
|
|
|
|
assert "window._extractInlineThinkingFromContentForRender(content, thinkingText)" in render
|
|
assert "thinkingText=split.reasoning||thinkingText" in render
|
|
assert "content=split.content" in render
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_inline_and_separate_reasoning_merge_not_drop():
|
|
"""#3633: the extractor MERGES inline + an explicitly-passed separate reasoning
|
|
payload (deduped) rather than dropping either. (The reload render path itself
|
|
deliberately does NOT seed m.reasoning into this extractor — that separation
|
|
is pinned by test_issue2565; the merge capability is exercised by the live
|
|
streaming path which passes liveReasoningText.)"""
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>inline</think>answer", "separate")
|
|
assert content == "answer"
|
|
assert reasoning == "separate\n\ninline"
|
|
|
|
# Identical inline + separate dedupe to one.
|
|
content2, reasoning2 = _split_thinking_from_content("<think>same</think>answer", "same")
|
|
assert content2 == "answer"
|
|
assert reasoning2 == "same"
|
|
|
|
# Separate-only (no inline tag) is preserved and content is untouched
|
|
# (no promotion of reasoning into visible prose).
|
|
content3, reasoning3 = _split_thinking_from_content("plain answer", "separate")
|
|
assert content3 == "plain answer"
|
|
assert reasoning3 == "separate"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extraction_is_linear_on_long_no_newline_content():
|
|
"""#3633 Codex perf catch: the indented-code / leading checks must not be
|
|
O(n^2). A 200k-char no-newline message must extract well under a second."""
|
|
import time
|
|
|
|
big = "x" * 200_000 + "answer"
|
|
start = time.time()
|
|
content, reasoning = _split_thinking_from_content(big)
|
|
elapsed = time.time() - start
|
|
assert content == big
|
|
assert reasoning == ""
|
|
assert elapsed < 1.0, f"extraction took {elapsed:.2f}s — likely quadratic"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_timeout_wrapper_remains_out_of_scope():
|
|
assert "Request timed out. Please try again." in WORKSPACE_JS
|
|
assert "AbortController" in WORKSPACE_JS
|