RFCs
This directory holds design documents for hermes-webui features that are worth thinking through in writing before (or alongside) implementation — typically when the change touches durability, recovery, schema, or cross- cutting infrastructure.
Conventions
-
One file per RFC. Filename is the topic (kebab-case), not a number.
-
Top of every RFC carries a small header:
- **Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Implemented | Withdrawn - **Author:** @github-handle - **Created:** YYYY-MM-DD -
Sections usually include: Problem, Goals, Non-goals, Proposal, Open questions, Rollout plan. Skip what doesn't apply.
-
An RFC is a starting point for review. Comments and revisions land via PR edits, not separate discussion threads.
-
An RFC documents a design direction. It is not an invitation to file implementation PRs against fragments of it. Before opening any PR that implements an accepted RFC, confirm with a maintainer in the tracking issue that the implementation slice is wanted and that no other contributor is already building it. Speculative implementations of RFC fragments without a confirmed integration site will be held.
When to file an RFC
- The change is large enough that you want consensus before writing code.
- The change touches data-at-rest formats or recovery semantics.
- The change introduces a new architectural primitive (journal, queue, scheduler, cache layer) that other features will build on.
- A reviewer asks for one during code review.
When in doubt, just ship the code — small features don't need RFCs. First-time contributor RFCs should be discussed in an issue before opening a PR.
Current RFCs
hermes-run-adapter-contract.md— Event/control compatibility contract and gap matrix for moving WebUI chat runs to Hermes-owned runtime execution.turn-journal.md— Crash-safe WebUI turn journal for recovering interrupted chat submissions.